Skip to content

Conversation

@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member

We discussed in Log SIG today and the current was unclear since it could be interpreted as API taking LogRecord as an input. This is not the case. The effect of making this API call is to emit a LogRecord to the pipeline, but the API does not take a LogRecord as an input. The input parameters are described in a subsequent paragraph.

We discussed in Log SIG today and the current was unclear since
it could be interpreted as API taking LogRecord as an input.
This is not the case. The effect of making this API call is
to emit a LogRecord to the pipeline, but the API does not
take a LogRecord as an input. The input parameters are described
in a subsequent paragraph.
@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member Author

@open-telemetry/specs-logs-approvers please review.

@tigrannajaryan tigrannajaryan merged commit 48d6964 into open-telemetry:main Apr 18, 2023
@tigrannajaryan tigrannajaryan deleted the feature/tigran/clarify-emit branch April 18, 2023 15:50
lmolkova pushed a commit to lmolkova/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
We discussed in Log SIG today and the current was unclear since it could
be interpreted as API taking LogRecord as an input. This is not the
case. The effect of making this API call is to emit a LogRecord to the
pipeline, but the API does not take a LogRecord as an input. The input
parameters are described in a subsequent paragraph.
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
We discussed in Log SIG today and the current was unclear since it could
be interpreted as API taking LogRecord as an input. This is not the
case. The effect of making this API call is to emit a LogRecord to the
pipeline, but the API does not take a LogRecord as an input. The input
parameters are described in a subsequent paragraph.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants